Going to hell in a festive handcart

Here is a piece I wrote about the Asda and Morrisons Christmas adverts for the Fatherhood Institute website.

Have yourself a sexist little Christmas? 

Why are two of our biggest supermarket chains turning gender equality back 40 years in their Christmas adverts this year? Asda and Morrisons both portray mothers running around like demented scullery maids for weeks on end as they get ready for the festivities. Stocking cupboards, buying and wrapping presents, writing Christmas cards, decorating trees, kitting the kids out in nativity costumes, wrestling with turkeys…you name it, the mums are in charge, and their task-lists are never-ending.

These selfless, saintly backbones of the family ask no reward for their festive domestic servitude, save for a fleeting moment of satisfaction as they feast on the sight of their over-fed, useless husbands, children and assorted family members snoring contentedly, semi-comatose in a post-prandial haze on Christmas afternoon, twixt Queen’s Speech and an evening of charades. You see – it’ll be worth all the effort in the end, girls!

Where are the fathers in these outmoded, cliché-ridden depictions of 21st century domestic bliss? They’re in there, but only as bit players – carving the turkey, plugging in the fairy lights, staring incompetently as their better halves choose the right tree. At their most visible, they exist simply to display a childlike ignorance of the mums’ true sacrifice. Hence at the end of the Asda film we see mum finally get to sit down with a glass of wine after 2 months’ graft, as dad delivers the final, inevitable punchline: ‘What’s for tea, love?’.

Without wishing to be too ‘bah humbug’ about this, let’s pause to think for a moment about the realities of UK family life. Research shows that between the late 1960s and 2004 the time British men spent on domestic work (including cooking and shopping) rose from 90 minutes to 148 minutes per day, while women’s dropped from 369 minutes to 280 minutes. It’s likely that since then, the figures have continued to converge. Survey after survey shows that both men and women want a better work-life balance, and more sharing of their earning and caring responsibilities.

No, men are not yet matching the time women devote to domestic work, but we know they’re on their way – just as we know that women are increasingly going out to work, but are still more likely to work in less-than-full-time jobs – and that when they do work full-time, they tend to work in more family-friendly roles, with shorter working hours and commutes.

So why would the supermarkets choose, in the context of this convergence, to portray the average British family in such a polarised way, filling Britain’s homes for the next month with images of women revelling in unpaid domestic drudgery, pathetically grateful for the chance to labour unrewarded in the face of their loved ones’ ignorance and sloth? Presumably because this is what the advertising executives’ focus groups tell them we want to watch.

In fact, both men and women seem to have been annoyed by the Asda advert in particular. The Advertising Standards Authority has launched a formal investigation after more than 190 people complained, and more than 100 people have signed an online petition against it. Small numbers, perhaps, but given people’s general apathy about making complaints – especially about what might easily be dismissed as a harmless bit of fun – indicative that the public is growing to expect more of its big household brands, perhaps.

In its ‘Live well for less’ campaign Sainsbury’s has certainly shown that it’s possible to warm the cockles of our hearts with depictions of everyday, involved fatherhood. And with its snow-people John Lewis has again found an engaging way to portray the spirit of Christmas without resorting to cliché (although mightn’t it have been more interesting if it had been her ‘going the extra mile’ to find a gift for him?). Even Argos’ blue shopping aliens  present a pretty even-handed reflection of mums and dads getting ready for the festivities.

By contrast, Asda and Morrisons’ mum-centric dystopias feel like a depressing and much-needed reminder that for all the progress we’ve made towards gender equality since the 1960s, our cultural inertia around motherhood and fatherhood remains scarily deep-seated. In most British families, mums, dads and other family members will be working together to prepare for and enjoy the festivities. Let’s not allow the likes of Saatchi and Saatchi fool us into thinking otherwise!

I've just had another look at this piece from Marketing Week, in which Asda CEO Andy Clarke stressed that his company hadn't aimed to cause any offence.

Check out the comments - not from Joe Public, mark you, but the sophisticated and engaged marketing professionals on whom British industry relies for cutting edge analysis and customer insight.

What else is there to say? We're all going to hell in a handcart. Merry bloody Christmas!!

Behind every great Christmas...there's a sexist advert

It was inevitable, I suppose. After P&G's Olympic 'mums single-handedly nurtured all our athletes' campaign, here's Asda's attempt to set us back 40 years by claiming that great Christmases are all down to...you guessed it...those sanctified souls who gave birth to us.

This advert is so dreadful, the first time I saw it I thought it was a spoof. It was clearly created by some maverick 1970s advertising executive who's just woken up after a 40-year drugs binge, hellbent on sending women straight back where they belong - the kitchen, so they can rustle him up a cheese toastie and Party Seven. Mindboggling in its awfulness.

Mothers among you will already, of course, be too busy ensuring the continuation of capitalism by endlessly, selflessly SHOPPING or otherwise preparing for the festivities, to have time to watch it. Gracious, a whole 1'01 of not stocking up on party platters, positioning scented candles or anticipating your loved-ones' every need? I think not, my lovelies!

Which leaves the rest of us parents (the feckless ones who, no matter how hard we try, just can't multi-task, remember us?) to put our feet up - AGAIN - and enjoy this flashback to simpler times.

Please God let's object to this nonsense, and get whoever conceived of it the sack. Sign the petition here. 

Rupert Everett, gay dads...and life as a little pink gladiator

Gay dads – good or bad thing? Silly question? Well following Rupert Everett's comments in the Sunday Times, this week the media has dared to ask it.

Taking part in a phone-in on Kaye Adams’ morning show on BBC Radio Scotland this morning, I found myself flailing in a sea of anti-gay-dad sentiment, courtesy of a succession of callers for whom Mr Everett’s unease about children being brought up by two men seems eminently sensible.

I did my best, ably assisted by a gay adoptive dad, the daughter of a lesbian couple, and Ms Adams herself, to make the point that it’s the quality of the parenting, not the gender (nor, dare I say it, sexuality) of the person delivering it, which matters.

This key insight - based, as pointed out by Patrick Strudwick in the Guardian, on a growing evidence base - only ever seems to come up in the media when a gay celebrity becomes a mum or dad, or makes a comment about gay parenting; or when there’s some kind of panic about lesbians having babies and the ‘death of the father’.

In fact, child development experts are increasingly clear that gender’s probably less important than we think in parenting - whether in a gay or straight context. Professor Joseph Pleck argued some time ago that if you’re looking for something uniquely male about the value of fathers’ parenting, for example, you’ll struggle to find it. Dads, like mums, are all different. What’s likely to be most important about all of them is their competent, confident, sensitive hands-on parenting from Day One.

So what? So while non-heterosexuals’ parenting may seem like something other, it in fact offers a springboard into an altogether bigger, more mainstream debate about gender in families (much needed in Scotland, if today's phone-in callers are anything to go by!).

Unfortunately, the media isn’t much interested in that. The TV and newspapers love nothing more than men being from Mars and women from Venus – a dichotomy that feeds effortlessly into pretty much all their coverage of family life (and most of the advertising that supports it). Mothers need to be soft, gentle, ‘natural’ parents…fathers harsh, awkward and ultimately…well, useless and a bit optional.

With that as the backdrop, it is of course fascinating to ponder how on Earth the gay version of parenthood (for there must, needless to say, only be one!) could possibly work, especially since lesbians all look like bikers and gay men just want to dance around to show tunes!

So until the media shifts from its simplistic and sensationalist stereotypes on gender, gay parents will carry on being cast to the lions from time to time – like little pink gladiators fighting the corner for modern, balanced and involved mother- and father-hood. Ah, life at the leading edge...Rupert, you just don't know what you're missing!

Why not 'proudly sponsor' dads too?

Now the Olympics is finished, does that mean an end to Procter & Gamble's horrid 'Proud Sponsor of Mums' campaign too? Please say yes!

Don't get me wrong, it's a great idea for an ad campaign. And it's as brilliantly executed as one might expect a huge international company, whose brands includes Fairy, Pampers, Max Factor, Ariel and Gillette, to produce. The mums' stories are great.

But come on guys, should a company of your size and reputation be so narrowly focused on mothers (presumably because research shows they're the ones who buy most of your stuff) that you'd miss such a big opportunity to also celebrate the many fathers and father-figures who work their fingers to the bone to help their children become Olympians? 

How to lose customers and offend half the world's parents in one easy lesson

Massive congratulations to Chris Routly, a daddy blogger from Pennsylvania whose petition against Huggies' demeaning 'Dad Test' advertising campaign forced Kimberly-Clark (Huggies' multinational owners) into an embarrassing turnaround.

The original campaign was based on the idea that Huggies nappies could withstand the ultimate test - that of being put on and taken off by fathers...who are of course completely incompetent fools.

Yes folks, an idea this sexist, patronising and ridiculous got through whatever processes exist at this huge international company, and was deemed perfectly ok to unleash on the unsuspecting consumers of America.

Thanks to floods of complaints and Mr Routly's petition, the company decided to adapt its campaign. You can read about the whole sorry tale in the Washington Post and on Mr Routly's own blog, Daddy Doctrines.

You really couldn't make this stuff up, could you?

Would YOU want to read about him?

I've never read a Joanna Trollope, and this poster hasn't done much to persuade me to change that. But given that this book is currently No. 1 in the Sunday Times bestseller list, presumably plenty of people saw this and felt moved to buy. Is it just me that finds this depressing?

My best 'dadvert' of 2011

Check out this Sainsbury's advert - probably the least patronising I've seen on TV...it's a few months old now, but somebody just reminded me of it and it's definitely worth a mention.

Why's it so good? Well first, dad's in charge of the day-to-day stuff - he's an involved dad, not just a babysitter. Secondly, he's clearly a loving father, comfortable spending 'normal' time with his son, providing him with entertainment and lots of love and affection, and enjoying his company. And thirdly, when mum appears at the end of the advert (she may have been at work...maybe she's breadwinner...who knows...doesn't matter) she's NOT there to roll her eyes towards heaven at the state they've left the house in.

Doesn't sound like much, does it? But amazingly few adverts show dads like this. So good, it almost makes me want to shop at Sainsbury's...